<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wireless companies are no longer in the network business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://caddellinsightgroup.com/blog2/index.php/2009/08/wireless-companies-are-no-longer-in-the-network-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://caddellinsightgroup.com/blog2/2009/08/wireless-companies-are-no-longer-in-the-network-business/</link>
	<description>A wide-ranging discussion of important business-related matters, such as innovation, risk, understanding customers and managing groups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NWGuy</title>
		<link>http://caddellinsightgroup.com/blog2/2009/08/wireless-companies-are-no-longer-in-the-network-business/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>NWGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caddellinsightgroup.com/blog2/?p=1426#comment-878</guid>
		<description>This is spot on but a HUGE hurdle for the companies.  This means that wireless is like any other product; the manufacturing (e.g. network, cellsites) is of minimal interest to the customer.  It is the device/customer service that differentiates.  The difficult internal factor for the companies is that one aspect of product is connection/dialtone; resistant people will always grasp that to say that they are a network company.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How many packaged food companies show their plant floor?  Ever seen a NIKE factory in an ad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is spot on but a HUGE hurdle for the companies.  This means that wireless is like any other product; the manufacturing (e.g. network, cellsites) is of minimal interest to the customer.  It is the device/customer service that differentiates.  The difficult internal factor for the companies is that one aspect of product is connection/dialtone; resistant people will always grasp that to say that they are a network company.</p>
<p>How many packaged food companies show their plant floor?  Ever seen a NIKE factory in an ad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Customers Are Talking &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another thing on customer service vs. network at wireless companies</title>
		<link>http://caddellinsightgroup.com/blog2/2009/08/wireless-companies-are-no-longer-in-the-network-business/comment-page-1/#comment-876</link>
		<dc:creator>Customers Are Talking &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another thing on customer service vs. network at wireless companies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caddellinsightgroup.com/blog2/?p=1426#comment-876</guid>
		<description>[...] Customers Are Talking A discussion of how to listen to, make sense of, and act on customer feedback, however it&#8217;s given      &#171; Wireless companies are no longer in the network business [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Customers Are Talking A discussion of how to listen to, make sense of, and act on customer feedback, however it&#8217;s given      &laquo; Wireless companies are no longer in the network business [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.504 seconds -->
