Archive for the ‘change management’ Category

“Switch,” by Chip & Dan Heath, is great

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

switch coverIf you follow the bestseller lists, you don’t need me to tell you about the new book “Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard,” by Chip & Dan Heath, the brothers who also wrote “Made to Stick” a couple of years ago.

I was not an unalloyed fan of their prior work, and so my expectations for “Switch” were muted. But very soon into the book, I realized that the Heaths’ approach – a wide survey of academic literature, highly memorable and pithy imperatives as an organizing principle (”Direct the Rider,” “Motivate the Elephant,” “Shape the Path”), and loads and loads of well-told stories – worked perfectly for the subject matter: the dry and confounding topic of change management.

The core of the book is a powerful set of metaphors coined by Jonathan Haidt from the University of Virginia. People’s minds are composed of a Rider (the rational brain, smart but reliant on others to get things done) and an Elephant (the emotional side, not particularly bright but powerful). The Heaths add a Path – the way people need to head to create change. Change requires work from the Rider and the Elephant working in tandem. Effecting change therefore means appealing to the Rider, incenting the Elephant, and creating a Path that minimizes the work those other two have to do.

The metaphor works, and unifies the arguments in the book over more than 250 pages. In addition, the Heaths cite research from many scholars in the field, including John Kotter, Amy Edmondson and Carol Dweck, whose work I’ve touched on in other posts. Finally, the narratives are highly relevant and memorable: I’ve already told several people about the Save the Children staffer who with virtually no resources figured out a way to help Vietnamese mothers reduce malnutrition in their children.

So, I give “Switch” an unqualified endorsement. It’s the business book of the year so far.

It helped, of course, that I started reading “Switch” at the exact right moment: as I began a project to help a company convert lessons from its customer-service experience into meaningful and sustained improvement. But in the business world, these moments recur all the time. We always need to change, and finding useful, applicable methods that don’t require you to be CEO or have a multi-million dollar budget to do it will always be needed.

Related posts:
Why I didn’t love “Made to Stick”
Posts referencing Amy Edmondson
Posts referencing John Kotter
Posts referencing Carol Dweck

An anecdote on the power of business narrative analysis

Friday, April 13th, 2007

I had lunch with a former colleague yesterday, whom I hadn’t seen in ten years. She related to me this story:

Last year we had a pilot of a new performance management system for our employees. The trial group was 4000 people. We had spent a lot of time on the pilot and gathered a lot of data. At the end of the trial, the VP of Human Resources printed out all the comments that had been received on the survey forms. He took them home one night and read every single one. Then he came in the next day and said, “We can’t roll this system out.” And that was it. The trial was very expensive. We’d gathered lots of data, lots of numbers, but the final determinant was what he read in those comments.

I had been talking to my friend about collecting and analyzing business narrative to assess organizational change using Anecdote’s methods. I told her, “He didn’t use a system, and comments aren’t necessarily stories. But, in essence, your VP was using the narrative technique.”

, , ,

Story v. Essay

Tuesday, February 27th, 2007

It’s becoming conventional wisdom that stories are a superior form of communication for complex information, such as strategies, value of technology products, business knowledge, brand attributes, etc. (Don’t believe me? Read these: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.)

Here’s a simple way to distinguish a story from another form of communication, the essay (which works well in other situations):

Story Essay
engages the senses engages the mind
concrete, detailed abstract/conceptual
specific general
contains moment-to- moment action. (“Thomas flicked his finger, causing his pen to twirl around his thumbnail until he caught it again.”) summarized (“Students are often bored in school.”)
suspenseful, surprising linear
uses action verbs “is”

Wait, you’re saying. Don’t some stories have the same characteristics as the essays you’re referring to?

Yes. But they’re rarely good stories.

(Picture by kaliyoda via stock.xchng)

, , , , ,