Archive for the ‘music’ Category

Best “multi-song music bundles” of the ’00’s

Monday, December 7th, 2009

Sorry for the title. “CDs” sounded old-fashioned, “albums” even worse. Well, that’s what happens when digital takes over. I buy music as mp3s, AACs, FLACs and sometimes in those round disk things that have been around for 25 years now. At any rate, it’s been a delight this week to listen past back to the best music of the past decade, and thank you to iTunes for making it much easier to sort through it all!

These are in no particular order.

sun kil moonSun Kil Moon “Ghosts of the Great Highway,” 2003. A beautiful, creepy suite of music. I listened to it once on an overnight flight to the UK, and the music provided a perfect soundtrack to my half-waking, half-asleep brain.

Track: “Glenn Tipton”

—-

strokes is this itThe Strokes, “Is This It,” 2001. Everyone compares this album to the Velvet Underground, and that sound is in it. But it always reminded me more of the great 1980’s Jersey band The Feelies, and listening to it this week reminded me of just that. Also, I heard on an interview with the Arctic Monkeys (see below) that this record got them to start playing music.

Track: “Hard to Explain”

sufjan stevens illinoiseSufjan Stevens, “Come On Feel The Illinoise,” 2005. Sufian looks like he’s not going to get to all 50 states as he had promised, but even if he doesn’t make any more music, this is a fitting testament to his talent. A beautiful piece of work that sounds like what Brian Wilson might have done had he been born 40 years later.

Track: “John Wayne Gacy Jr.”

amy winehouse backAmy Winehouse, “Back to Black,” 2007. The neo-soul revival was one of my favorite trends of the decade, and this album is the best of a very good crop. It brings you back to the 60s and 70s, and at the same time sounds completely fresh and new.

Track: “Tears Dry On Their Own”

arctic monkeys whateverArctic Monkeys, “Whatever They Say I Am, That’s What I Am Not,” 2007. Alex Turner and bandmates’ follow-on releases haven’t hooked me the way their debut did. Great post-punk a la Franz Ferdinand and the Gang of Four (and the Strokes), with absolutely the best lyrics of the decade. Bar none.

Track: “Fake Tales of San Francisco”

nomo ghost rockNomo, “Ghost Rock,” 2008. This album sounds to me like the future of music. A seamless melange of jazz, funk and African music, using horns, guitars, drums, percussion and a collection of homemade instruments. Put this record on and try not to start moving to the beat. I defy you.

Tracks: “Rings,” “Round the Way,” “Three Shades”

NOMO Live session from Svetlana legetic on Vimeo.

Sigur Ros untitlesSigur Ros, “( )” 2002. Forget Bjork. If you want to hear great music out of Iceland, Sigur Ros is your band. Who needs lyrics in an actual language?

Track: “Untitled #1″

ryan adams love is hellRyan Adams, “Love is Hell,” 2004. Adams has made lots of music, and this is one of his less-heralded efforts, but to me it’s the best. A highlight: the most “Purple Rain”-sounding song not called “Purple Rain”: “Hotel Chelsea Nights.”

Track: “Hotel Chelsea Nights”

wilco yankee hfWilco, “Yankee Hotel Foxtrot,” 2002. OK, this is on everyone’s list, but there’s a reason for it. Jeff Tweedy’s songwriting is at a peak, plus the crazy noise on the songs, the fight with the record label, the film, etc. And the timing of the album was just eerie: try to listen to “Jesus etc.” without thinking of 9/11. I can’t.

Track: “Jesus, etc.”

radiohead kid aRadiohead, “Kid A,” 2000. This is also on everyone’s list (at the top of many), but that doesn’t make it any less amazing. From the first notes, a complete departure from their earlier work (where are the guitars?). Still sounds ahead of its time 9 years later.

Track: “Kid A”

mmj zMy Morning Jacket, “Z,” 2005. A shaggy and great record. Combines almost every significant 1970s musical reference in one album. Tastes of Zeppelin, Allman Brothers, the Who, etc., etc. Somehow, Jim James and crew can channel reggae and the electro-pop group Air in the same song.

Track: “Off The Record”

david gray white ladderDavid Gray, “White Ladder,” 2000. Basically the early ’00’s soundtrack for Philadelphia AAA station WXPN, the station that everyone in my area over 35 listens to. The formula: singer-songwriter plus electronics. And it still sounds great.

Track: “Please Forgive Me”

lucinda williams essenceLucinda Williams, “Essence,” 2001. Not quite another “Car Wheels On a Gravel Road”–but still excellent. Williams’ lyrics are pared back here, the music remains intense.

Track: “Bus to Baton Rouge

Another glimpse into the sausage factory that is music industry accounting

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

I am fascinated by the music business and how it totes up dollars and cents owed to various parties that contribute to making music I listen to every day.

Of course, it’s easy for me to be fascinated, as I don’t have to buy dinner or pay the mortgage with royalty checks from music I’ve made.

Recently, Tim Quirk from the band Too Much Joy posted a recent royalty statement that he received from TMJ’s former label, Warner Brothers. Even funnier (and more depressing) than the invoice itself is Tim’s essay describing how “unrecouped” bands (those that haven’t paid back their advances to the label) are treated and how cavalier (or malignant) the accounting is for those bands.

Tim now works at Rhapsody, so he knows how digital distributors account for the music they stream or download. As a result, he is able to poke holes in the corporate lackeys’ lame stories about why, for example, there are 12 outlets reporting sales for two of their albums but zero digital sales for a third album.

He is pretty humble, though, when he talks about bands like his who haven’t recouped their advances. Too humble, in my view. He takes at face value the label’s contention that they need to pay “money-making artists” like REM before they worry about giving minor bands an accurate accounting of their indebtedness. And, when you look at owing a label over $350,000 for albums you made more than a decade ago, it seems as if worrying about potential inaccuracy of a few tens of thousand dollars is pointless.

On the other hand, if the studios’ approach to measuring bands’ revenues is so cavalier and self-interested, I would have no confidence in the $350,000 number either. Who’s to say that’s accurate? Who’s to say, perhaps, that Too Much Joy shouldn’t be getting checks from Warners instead of hassles?

Here’s my favorite song from the band:

Too Much Joy |MTV Music

Another great reference on the artist’s perspective of the music business is Jacob Slichter of Semisonic’s memoir “So You Wanna Be a Rock & Roll Star.”

UPDATE 12/3: This essay by producer Steve Albini crisply lays out the situation bands face. In the hypothetical example he devises, a new band sells 250K albums and, somehow, still owes the label money!

(Hat tip Felix Salmon)

Related post:
Podcast: Fran Ten of West Indian Girl on the modern music business

Wilco lawsuit reveals some of how band economics work

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

If (like me) you’re interested in how the business of music works, there’s a fascinating peek into how bands divide up money illustrated in Jay Bennett’s lawsuit against Wilco’s Jeff Tweedy, claiming underpayment.

I’m not passing judgment on Bennett’s allegations (though there are some dubious claims here). If you’re interested in Tweedy’s response, you can find it here.

There is joy in repetition

Friday, April 17th, 2009

Prince sang that, almost 20 years ago on the “Graffiti Bridge” soundtrack. (In fact, he sang it over and over on that song.) The expression came to mind today, as I was enjoying one of my favorite tracks from a SxSW band this year, “To All Tiny Creatures” (mp3 via sxsw.com) by All Tiny Creatures out of Madison, Wisconsin.

It’s an electronica song, with no vocals, and it’s pretty repetitive. My wife wouldn’t like it. “Those electronica songs go on and on, and sound the same.”

She’s right, but there is pleasure in the small changes that present themselves in songs like “To All Tiny Creatures.” For one thing, the song slowly builds, without changing tempo, from a spare song to a driving, full orchestra. I love this in songs. One of my favorite examples is a song from the great late ’80’s band The Silencers, titled “Answer Me.” The singer starts alone, but soon he’s accompanied by thundering drums and a steady aggregation of sounds, and the song has become an anthem.

“To All Tiny Creatures” has that. A few minutes in, it’s moved on from its minimalist start to a real driving beat that has my head bobbing every time I listen to it.

Then, at its fullest, synthesizer lines wash in and out, making each chorus slightly different. And these lines have their own arcs. As a children’s book my kids like says, “It’s different… but the same.”

People praise originality, but music in particular thrives on repetition. Whether it’s the recurring themes of a Bach’s “Goldberg Variations,” or Springsteen singing “Hiding on the backstreets” a few dozen times, or “To All Tiny Creatures,” it’s good to know that redundancy in our music suits us just fine.

Ten bucks

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

When I was a teenager, the stores in our town stayed open late on Thursday nights between Thanksgiving and Christmas. In 1978 I worked at one of the local hardware stores and I was on duty one of those Thursdays. I had earlier that day cashed my paycheck. Around seven or so, business was slow and I asked the manager if I could take 15 minutes and walk up to The Gramophone Shop. I went in and bought a record I had had my eyes on for a number of weeks: Dire Straits’ first album. It cost, by my recollection, $8.98 plus tax.

Was that album worth ten bucks? It’s a stupid question. That album was part of the soundtrack of my late high school years. It was probably worth $100 to me.

Now it seems that people who spend ten bucks on music are stupid. Free mp3’s are everywhere, legitimately or otherwise. Subscription services and internet radio stations offer everything at the touch of a browser button. There’s a sea of music out there, just waiting for a listen.

But paying ten bucks for an album caused you to make a decision. (Not that those decisions always worked out. For example: the Knack’s second album.) You had to hear enough songs to get a good assurance that the album was decent, or take a risk that the one great song you heard was a pattern for the rest of the album. (Also not foolproof; see Sniff ‘n’ the Tears.)

Carrie Brownstein’s recent post on NPR Monitor Mix brought this to mind. Carrie lamented the decline of the record label, in this case the decision by Touch & Go Records to stop distributing the work of smaller labels. Wrote Carrie:

We are careening toward a paucity of experience and a paucity of means with which to evaluate music. I mean, can we really engage with art on a Web site and in a vacuum, without ever bothering to contextualize it or make it coherent with our lives or form a community around the work? If we never move beyond the ephemeral and facile nature of music Web sites — and let’s not lie to ourselves, that’s where it ends for a lot of us these days — then that makes us worse than blind consumers; it makes us dabblers. We have become musical tourists. And tourism is the laziest form of experience, because it is spoonfed and sold to us. Tourism cannot and should not replace the physical energy, the critical thinking and the tiresome but ultimately edifying road of adventure, and thus also of life.

To me, the process of getting recommendations, listening to a friend’s record, hearing something great on the radio (or a podcast), then making the decision to plunk down real money is, in Carrie’s words, an adventure–and one of the great pleasures in enjoying music. If everything’s at your fingertips, undifferentiated, you can sample, skip and flit around. You’re, as Carrie said, a tourist.

And to me that’s a bad thing. Free music isn’t only bad for musicians, it seems. It’s also bad for the audience.

Related post:
Must We Give Away Digital Creative Works?

More on "NOMO Concert"

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

If today’s earlier post made you curious about the group NOMO, here is a cool live video of a few songs. Now you can see why I was bummed I had to leave the concert so soon!


NOMO Live session from Svetlana legetic on Vimeo.

You can learn even more about NOMO at their Myspace page here.

More Friday randomness

Friday, September 5th, 2008

If you love music and occasionally like to peek behind the curtain to learn more about how a recording is made, then this post by Thomas Dolby is essential reading.

If your only recollection of TMDR is “She Blinded Me With Science” or “Airhead” you’d do well to check out all his discs. He remains an excellent and creative musician. And it’s wonderful that he lets us in on how he works.

Reading this reminds me that I need to buy the CD of Dolby’s “The Flat Earth.” It’s one of those titles that I had on vinyl but never replaced when I went to CDs.

UPDATE: Just downloaded the MP3 of “The Flat Earth.” Ain’t e-commerce great?

Best CD of the half-year

Monday, July 21st, 2008

My favorite album, by far, of 2008 is Nomo’s Ghost Rock. A concoction of dance-funk, electronica and horns, it’s strong from start to finish–from “Brainwave,” where the lead instrument is a bleep-bleeping analog synthesizer and the other instruments provide weird backup, to “Nova,” a plinky dance track. And in between, the title track and “All The Stars” are standouts.

Great rhythms, improvisation, funky beats that will make you move your body. They’re all here. But don’t look for vocals, because there aren’t any.

The band, nine strong, is from Ann Arbor, Michigan. Their earlier albums, “Nomo” and “New Tones” are also excellent. I had a chance to see some of their live show when they were in Philadelphia last week, and they absolutely rocked.

The best way to check out some of their music and see tour dates is to go to their Myspace page.

Fran Ten mini-podcast: the impact of filesharing on musicians

Friday, June 20th, 2008

The recent post on giving away digital creative works has gotten some attention, not least because of the link from the New York Times’ David Pogue on his blog. One of the inspirations for the post was my talk with Fran Ten of the great LA band West Indian Girl–specifically when he spoke eloquently and from the heart about the issue of filesharing and its impact on music and musicians.

I’ve extracted that piece of the podcast into a mini-podcast (5min30 seconds long). You can download it here.

, , , , , , ,

Must we give away digital creative works?

Wednesday, June 11th, 2008

I’ve been thinking about this a lot recently, spurred on by the recent Fran Ten podcast, this David Pogue post, and most recently a thoughtful post by Scott Goodson based on this column by economist Paul Krugman.

The upshot of Krugman’s argument, referencing Esther Dyson’s prediction from the early ’90’s, is that digital creative works will become free, and creative artists will have to make their money from “ancillary” projects, such as touring, personal appearances, licensing, etc.

If this turns out to be true (and the music industry is approaching this state right now), then it has a lot of negative ramifications for the future of creativity.

First off is the fairness question. Here is a simplified digital media value chain:

  • Digital distributors (i.e., ISPs like Comcast) make money through subscriptions
  • Directories and aggregators (like Google) make money through advertising
  • Creators make… nothing?

While the structure of technology allows this to happen, it’s hard to look at this picture and see it as fair. I agree that DRM sucks, but is the solution “pay what you want“–a virtual tip jar?

Furthermore, if creating a work of art cannot in itself make money, it will then be difficult to invest much in that creation. While that may allow bloggers to continue (though I wouldn’t turn down a few bucks for my work if that were possible), it doesn’t bode well for musicians or moviemakers, and, soon, book authors.

If I can make money in personal appearances but not by writing, I will have to limit my writing time in order to, you know, pay the mortgage.

If a band can make money touring but not through selling CDs, they will be unlikely to spend much time in the recording studio, or to spend money on studio effects or gear. Perhaps they will instead simply tape their concerts and compile albums from the live sessions.

If a moviemaker cannot make money from her films because they are freely available on the web, she will have difficulty using any approach other than Dogme 95 in order to reduce costs. And do we want to see Dogme 95-style movies all the time?

The irony is that time put into making money takes away from time to create. Therefore, the output from our best artists is less. Is that progress?

Perhaps this is offset somewhat by the “long tail” of creators enabled by new technology. But I would trade 1000 bad “Nude” remixes for one new album by an artist I really like.

(Photo: pro-copying logo from piratbyran.org)

Related Posts:
Shop Talk Podcast #9 – Fran Ten of West Indian Girl on today’s music business
How will musicians get paid in the 21st century?

Tags:
, , , , , ,