Archive for the ‘narrative’ Category

Rakontu, open-source story-sharing software, is here

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

If you’ve read this blog regularly, you may have encountered me discussing how nice it would be to gather stories from front-line personnel and share them with the rest of the company, or to have a repository where staff members could share information that’s pertinent to the company, its customers, competitors and markets.

One barrier to these ideas was the unavailability (or unaffordability) of software that was adept at storing, annotating, tagging, and presenting this messy kind of narrative data. Well, that barrier is down, effective immediately.

Cynthia Kurtz, one of the pioneers in the story-listening world and author of “Working With Stories,” has developed an open-source package called Rakontu, which is the best thing I’ve seen at collecting and presenting narrative data, involving a community in adding to it, and making it generally useful to a group of people–the contributors included.

It’s a beautiful, elegantly-designed application, far more polished than users of new software have a right to expect. There are a couple of webcasts available on the Rakontu website which you should watch if you are interested.

(Disclosure: I’ve done a bit of collaboration with Cynthia and was an alpha tester of the software. No money changed hands ;)

By the way, Cynthia has started a blog, “Story-Colored Glasses,” which you should put into your RSS reader immediately.

Related posts:
Gathering customer intelligence from your front-line staff
Bringing the outside in

A wide-ranging (and free) e-book on narrative

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

Kathy Hansen of the A Storied Career blog has been conducting interviews of storytelling figures large and small for nearly two years now, and has collected these into an e-book, available via this link.

I’ve been following the interview series with interest and, as mentioned in the title of this post, it’s a very wide-ranging look at storytelling and its uses. As such, there’s some of it that doesn’t speak to me very much. On the other hand, there are parts that I find extremely valuable. Like this…

Cynthia Kurtz on “approaches that don’t respect the integrity of the raw story and end up … injecting the biased interpretations of people outside the community:” There are two positions embedded in that statement — raw stories and self-interpretation — and I can tell a story from my own experience describing how I came to my current understanding of each position. The first position is that raw stories of personal experience are far superior to crafted stories for the things I care about when working with stories. For the purposes of advertising products and services, delivering specific purposeful messages, and entertaining people, crafted stories are often (but not always) best. But for the purposes of helping people learn, think, make decisions, get new ideas, grow, and get along, I’ve found that there is nothing better than a raw story. (NB: The entire interview with Cynthia is so valuable I have printed it out and refer to it regularly.)

and this:

Whitney Quesenbery on storytelling in user experience design: Although user experience [UX] stories are built on insights from research, their purpose is to help create something new. Often, they explore how a new or updated product can change an unsatisfactory experience into a good one. They describe a possible future condition, and in doing so help it become a reality.

This is not all user experience stories, of course. Sometimes, we use stories to present a current or past situation. But the reason we spend time thinking about current experience is to be able to create new experiences — and move us into the future. … Every UX project involves managing a lot of information. Even a small site involves balancing the business goals, user needs, and technical possibilities. When you are working on a large project it’s hard to stay focused on the goal of creating an excellent user experience, because you are managing so many details and (sometimes) conflicting needs. The other difficulty is keeping the “user” in sight. Perhaps that sounds strange for work on the user experience, but typically the users are not part of the design and development team, so it’s easy to ignore them.

With their ability to communicate so effectively, and on such a deep level, stories are one way to manage both challenges. They are a natural way to describe events, brainstorm ideas, engage the imagination, and build community around the new design.

oh, and this (self-promotion alert):

John Caddell: There has been an immense amount of investment in the last 20 years in business-process re-engineering and process standardization and in IT systems and to support those initiatives. We’ve taken process improvement about as far as it can go. In fact, we’ve taken it a bit too far. With companies applying Six Sigma to things like sales processes (???), and not surprisingly achieving poor results, it is time to seek new tools. And narrative is a perfect tool to help shed light on complex questions (Is our reorganization helping the company to perform better? Is this a good or lousy place to work? Why aren’t people buying our new product?).

Here are some of the other contributors whose work I know and respect:
Stephane Dangel
Thaler Pekar
Shawn Callahan
Ardath Albee

So, I’d recommend you take a look; you’ll likely find things that you can use.

Tally the votes, but if you want insight, read the comments

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

I was reading the new Harvard Business Review today at lunch, specifically the piece by Guido Jouret of Cisco on the company’s recent external innovation tournament (interestingly, that’s the name of a new book I’m reading right now). There’s lots of good stuff in the HBR article about sourcing innovations externally, but one sentence in particular stopped me in my tracks–in a good way. Jouret wrote:

On balance, voting was less useful than comments in helping us choose the 40 semifinalists…. Some commenters showed deep subject-matter expertise and insight.

This throwaway line reminded me of a prior post, where I recounted a story a friend had told me about an HR VP making a decision based on survey comments. Here’s the story:

Last year we had a pilot of a new performance management system for our employees. The trial group was 4000 people. We had spent a lot of time on the pilot and gathered a lot of data. At the end of the trial, the VP of Human Resources printed out all the comments that had been received on the survey forms. He took them home one night and read every single one. Then he came in the next day and said, “We can’t roll this system out.” And that was it. The trial was very expensive. We’d gathered lots of data, lots of numbers, but the final determinant was what he read in those comments.

Freeform data such as comments, anecdotes, rants, etc., aren’t easy to manage. But they contain tons of insight. Sometimes all you need to do is read them.

Public health story database needs your contributions

Monday, November 24th, 2008

Cognitive Edge and a nonprofit called Innovation Health are launching a narrative database focused on public health issues, including child vaccinations and obesity. It needs your stories of encounters with the medical industry.

Health care is one of the preeminent issues of our time and will be front and center in our consciousness when the financial crisis is long past. The health-care infrastructure is a complex system with lots of actors, and so narrative analysis offers a better way of evaluating it than surveys or metrics.

Please consider sharing your experiences. The link is here and the password is HEALTH.

Note the following:

By participating in the survey, you acknowledge, accept and approve the use of the information provided by Innovation Health and the Cognitive Edge practitioner network. Innovation Health will use the information to observe patterns that the stories may reveal. The Cognitive Edge practitioner network may use the information collected as a demonstration data set to illustrate the applicability of sense-making to health and wellness.

Related post:
Is there a health-care crisis? The stories say yes

Tags:
, , ,

"Public relations firm took too long to change to home-based business"

Thursday, November 20th, 2008

From The Mistake Bank:

Reporter Marcia Pledger of The Cleveland Plain Dealer has been collecting and publishing great small-business mistake stories for a while. Here’s a nice one about the cost of worrying too much about what others’ perceptions might be:

A manufacturing company told me that if I started a public relations firm, I had its business. My next move was to find a location. Relationships are one thing, but I needed credibility for prospects.

Starting a business from my home 22 years ago was not even a thought. Back then, home-based businesses were not considered “real” businesses, so I leased an office….

read the rest of the story at the Plain Dealer site here.

, , , , ,

From The Mistake Bank: Sue Pera on the downside of expansion

Tuesday, November 11th, 2008

From The Mistake Bank:

This is the first of a series of interviews with businesspeople about mistakes they’ve made in their careers. If you’d like to be part of this series, email me at john (at) caddellinsightgroup (dot) com.


Find more videos like this on The Mistake Bank

Sue Pera is the owner of the Cornerstone Coffeehouse in Camp Hill, PA. Visit them on the web at http://thecornerstonecoffeehouse.com. (Disclosure: I usually hang out here on Friday mornings, when the cleaners come to do my office. It’s a great place; if you happen to find yourself in Camp Hill, you must stop by.)

Tags:
, , , , , ,

Comparing two customer research approaches

Tuesday, November 4th, 2008

I had two remarkable experiences today.

First, I interviewed a marketing manager about some software he uses. He spent thirty-five minutes describing why the company chose the software, how he used it, how he learned to use the features over time and thereby developed proficiency in an area of marketing he hadn’t known well before, how the supplier had given him very responsive support, how the user’s group had helped him… and, by the way, three or four features that, if they existed, could really help him. I recorded everything and will review this and a number of other interviews with the client using narrative sensemaking approaches. In the end, they’ll get a deep, detailed picture of how they’re viewed by their customers. They’ll know features that customers will value. And they’ll know some things that bother their clients.

Later in the day, I got a survey to fill out. It looked like this:

Rate each question on a scale of 1-5, with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent.

* Trainer communicated in a clear, concise, and easily understood manner.

Comments:

* Demonstrated that he is knowledgeable in [...].

Comments:

* Displays pride, enthusiasm, and a positive attitude in his work.

Comments:

* Demonstrates a professional attitude and supports the [client].

Comments:

* Practice topics are clear and correct for [skill and experience].

Comments:

* Trainers were timely and approachable with problems and concerns.

Comments:

It’s unfair, I know, to compare the two approaches. The first is more expensive and time-consuming. There is more at stake for the software company than for the second group, a nonprofit.

But, really, what can one possibly learn from the second approach? Isn’t the interview method better in about 1,000 ways?

Tags:
, , ,

The voices say: time to read "War and Peace"

Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

Sometimes something tiny can influence us, such as a Tweet–this one:

Increasingly amazed (and worried) at the number of people I know and respect who do not read novels.

Then today I read this blog post: “Tolstoi’s Guide to Complexity,” about “War and Peace.” The post’s author, Jochum Stienstra, writes eloquently about how the book has influenced his thinking since he read it fourteen years ago.

Okay, I said. This is a message to me. Time to put aside the stack of unread business books and spend a little sabbatical reading an old classic. I’ve picked up and put down “War and Peace” perhaps ten times. Never read it.

Now it’s time. I dug my old Signet Classic edition out of the box and cracked it open. Again.

, ,

Your voices needed to help a worthy project

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

Can the sharing of stories bring a community together?

It worked in the olden days, but has become a lost art in the age of television, internet, and videogames. Robert Putnam’s book “Bowling Alone” described a society where isolation reigns and communities are frayed.

My friend and colleague Cynthia Kurtz has applied for a Knight News Challenge grant to develop web2.0 software precisely to facilitate the gathering, sharing and passing on of stories that used to go on around the campfire or village square. The Knight folks want the public (that means you) to review and comment on the applications. It would be doing a great service if you would visit the site here and weigh in on Cynthia’s application.

Here’s how she describes the project:


Long ago, story caretakers tended the diverse stories of the community: eliciting, understanding, maintaining. But those traditions have declined as commercial storytelling rose and community coherence fell. The physical-digital split means that today older people tell stories in community centers while younger people tell them on Facebook. People still tell stories, but no one is bringing all of the stories together into community-wide patterns, making sense of those patterns, and helping the stories get to where they need to be in times of need. We are building a free and open source software package called Rakontu (”tell a story” in Esperanto) that will help communities share and work with raw stories of personal experience for mutual understanding, conflict resolution and decision support. By supporting and bridging online and offline storytelling, Rakontu will help communities regenerate the sustaining functions of story caretakers so that they can take better care of their stories again.

An important part of the project is how this would bring benefit to communities. Cynthia explains it this way:


Rakontu will help communities tell, annotate and connect stories; discover insight-creating patterns in them; and use stories to resolve conflicts and make decisions together. This degree of support is only available today through the help of experienced narrative practitioners. Rakontu will embody understandings about narrative in communities so that people will not have to know anything about narrative to benefit from its use. Some possible outcomes are better understandings of opposing perspectives, a greater diversity of voices being heard, better consensus on tough choices, more problems dealt with before they get worse, safer streets, fewer footholds for extremism and paranoia, and greater common strength in times of crisis.

I’ve written in this blog, over and over, about the use of stories for knowledge sharing, learning, and creating insight. You’re probably tired of reading about it. But think about this: we should be using every tool at our disposal to help bring our communities together, to combat the “bowling alone” syndrome, and make our neighborhoods a better place to live. That’s what Rakontu can do, and I hope you’ll visit the Knight News Challenge site and support Cynthia’s application.

(Disclosure: I have worked with Cynthia on this grant and will be conducting community trials of the software if the grant is awarded. Therefore I have a vested interest in getting the grant approved.)

Tags:
, , , ,

AG Lafley on P&G’s innovation culture: "The consumer is boss"

Thursday, October 23rd, 2008

In the newest issue of Booz & Co’s “Strategy + Business,” A.G. Lafley describes the innovation culture at his company, Procter & Gamble.

Hearing insights from Lafley and P&G about innovation is becoming a cliche, but this quote struck me as apt:

So we expanded our mission to in­clude the idea that “the consumer is boss.” In other words, the people who buy and use P&G products are valued not just for their money, but as a rich source of in­formation and direction. If we can develop better ways of learning from them — by listening to them, observing them in their daily lives, and even living with them — then our mission is more likely to succeed.

This what I’m thinking about much of the time now. How to help companies listen to, and learn from, “the bosses.”

, , ,