Archive for the ‘operations’ Category

“Backshoring”: the new buzzword that may give you a job

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

A recent post from Booz & Company’s “Strategy + Business” introduced a new term: “backshoring” – an emerging trend of returning manufacturing from an offshore location to the home country (”The Case For Backshoring“). This is especially important for US business, which has been a very aggressive proponent of offshoring for the past decade. Why is this reversal happening? In short, the conditions that made outsourcing look so attractive have changed utterly:

…The logic behind backshoring is compelling enough that it cannot be easily dismissed as a mere short-term aberration. Higher transportation costs as well as rising wages and raw materials prices in China, inevitable by-products of the huge gains that the developing country’s GDP has made despite the global recession, have frightened some U.S. companies away from Asia.

Another factor is the impact of distance from core customers on products with heavy user contribution:

NCR’s decision to backshore goes well beyond dollars and cents — and, in fact, may provide the most convincing rationale for the gains that backshoring can produce. The ATMs being made in Columbus now are NCR’s most sophisticated, capable of scanning checks and cash and eliminating the need for the customer to fill out a deposit slip. This feature has provided a welcome revenue lift for NCR — bringing in as much as US$50 million a year, significant for a company with $5 billion in annual sales. But these machines likely never would have been developed had large customers like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America not persistently prodded NCR to move in that direction. That type of potentially profitable interaction between NCR and its customers is difficult, and launching desirable new products is slowed considerably, NCR’s Dorsman says, when the manufacturing facilities are offshore. “We take our cue from our customers,” says Dorsman. “They are heavily involved in the development process. And with this new approach we’re taking, we can get innovative products to the market faster, no question.”

NCR also found that having Flextronics manufacture high-end ATMs in Brazil — and relying on the vendor’s third-party suppliers, many of which NCR was unfamiliar with — left important internal constituencies in the dark, further slowing and complicating new product launches. Hardware and software engineers, sourcing executives, manufacturing and operations staff, and customer service managers all had trouble applying their expertise throughout the many remote handoffs between separate organizations.

The post does not take up whether outsourced business processes, such as customer service, are also being “backshored”–though I’ve heard of companies pulling some sales processes back from locations such as India and the Philippines due to ineffectiveness. And the same economic factors (increased costs at offshore locations) are at play. It’s good to realize, at any rate, that the trend of sending processes far away is not inexorable and there may be, in fact, good reasons for companies to keep them at home.

Why did Amp’d Mobile stumble?

Monday, June 4th, 2007

It’s another day of negative news for the US MVNO industry. One of the highest-profile operators, Amp’d Mobile, filed yesterday for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. According to theWall Street Journal (link – $$), they simply ran out of cash. How did they get to this position?

In the MVNO business (as well as the mobile operator business), customer signups are really expensive. It costs, depending on your distribution model, marketing model, etc., from $100 to $400 to sign up a customer. Meaning it will take perhaps eight to twenty-four months for a subscriber to pay off the initial investment in signing him up.

Established carriers have a large existing customer base to defray the cost of adding new customers. Startups don’t. Therefore, they must have enough working capital to absorb these losses until they reach a critical mass of customers. Amp’d apparently didn’t.

One other thing. I’ve heard from some Amp’d subscribers that their bills were late, that they didn’t receive bills at all for some months, and in some cases they received bills with an outstanding balance of a penny.

You don’t read much about billing in telecoms, as opposed to, say, marketing. But late bills, missing bills, etc., cause customers to withhold or delay payment. A carrier with these issues leaves money on the table–money that could help pay its bills while it waits for those new customers to turn positive. It’s not clear how much this impacted Amp’d’s situation, but it was a factor for sure.

Marketing is sexy, but collecting money from customers? That’s priceless.