Posts Tagged ‘cognitive bias’

Shop Talk Podcast: Sydney Finkelstein on “Think Again”

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

I recently finished “Think Again: Why Good Leaders Make Bad Decisions and How to Keep it From Happening to You” and it is my favorite business book of the year so far. Sydney Finkelstein and his co-authors, Jo Whitehead and Andrew Campbell, systematically dissect why we sometimes make and carry through terrible business decisions–whether it’s a poor acquisition decision, an ill-fated product redesign, or even deciding to park our money with Bernie Madoff or Allen Stanford. Even better, they let us know how to create structures that identify possibly faulty decisions in order to avoid them or, at minimum, monitor their outcomes carefully so bad ones can be reversed as quickly as possible.

Syd is a clear, engaging speaker, and was a delight to have on the podcast. Listen in for a 20-minute lesson on how we decide and how we can decide better. The podcast file is here.

Summary:

0:33 – Why studying decisions gone wrong is interesting and useful

1:05 – How our brain’s evolution impacts sound decisionmaking

2:35 – Has the complexity of our businesses outpaced our brain’s ability to keep up?

3:38 – Four red-flag conditions indicating possible faulty decisionmaking

8:03 – Decision-affecting attachments to people, ideas, things

9:20 – Important decisionmaking process safeguards

For more information, you can access a web site with more resources about “Think Again.”

[Theme music: "Up the Coast" by West Indian Girl, from their album "4th & Wall."]

Grounded qualification corollary #1 – don’t companies know why they win or lose?

Thursday, January 15th, 2009


Yesterday’s post spurred some interesting comments, including Dave Stein’s observation that “80% of B2B deals are lost for one of two reasons: inadequate (or no) qualification or inadequate (or no) planning.”

I wanted to elaborate on one point, which is that grounded qualification is built on a deep understanding of why a company won and lost each opportunity, both in the past and going forward.

Which begs a question: “Don’t companies already know why they win or lose?”

This question has two answers: sometimes they don’t know at all, and sometimes they think they know the reasons but are wrong. Let’s take each of these in turn.

We don’t know why we won or lost.
This situation is influenced by many factors in today’s working world. First, there is little time for reflection built into sales professionals’ (or sales managers’) days. Everyone carries long to-do lists, attends too many meetings and is measured to death. (See this post for the implications of this culture on innovation and creative thinking.) There is also a culture of looking ahead: “let’s not rehash the past,” especially if it the outcome was negative.

We think we know why, but we are wrong. This point gets to a cognitive bias called the “actor-observer bias.” According to the Wikipedia definition, this means people “tend to attribute their own behavior to their circumstances (i.e., situation causes), but tend to attribute the behaviors of those [they] observe to their dispositions (i.e., person causes).” In sales campaigns we will attribute a successful outcome to our superior strategies or tactics (rarely luck), and blame failures on ignorant or biased prospects or factors out of our control (product was deficient, price was too high, etc.). We are so satisfied with these rote explanations that we don’t probe deeply into the reasons, nor do we ask the prospects to explain their actions.

If we recognize that (1) we need to reflect on and learn from each deal we pursue, and (2) question our assumptions and dig for the deeper reasons we won or lost, we are on the way to understanding our true position in the marketplace–a tool we can use to be more selective in our pursuits, address our weaknesses, and generate more business at lower sales costs.