Posts Tagged ‘competition’

Love your own products, but don’t demonize others’

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

When I first started working for GTE, I went to a seminar where different operating divisions discussed their businesses with a group of recent hires. The highlight of the afternoon was the lighting division, where the presenters highlighted their contempt for their arch-competitor, General Electric, by smashing a four-pack of GE lightbulbs under their feet.

I was working for the Government Systems group at the time, on a long-term project, and felt light years away from competitors. I envied my colleagues for the intense loyalty they displayed.

More recently, an executive at a company I know sent an email to all employees outlining his displeasure that certain employees were using competitor products instead of the company’s. Using the company’s products was a matter of loyalty. He made it clear: competitor products were banned from the workplace, and suggested that employees who didn’t agree were perhaps working for the wrong company.

In Oded Shenkar’s provocative new book “Copycats: How Smart Companies Use Imitation to Gain a Strategic Edge,” he writes this:

Innovators must focus their efforts on a few core features, and even then they may produce a novel and creative recombination of imitated and innovative elements. This combination will surely be resisted by innovators that despise imitation and view it as anathema to their vision statement and claims of corporate leadership; but unless these companies accept imitation on equal terms, they may drown in “invented here” risks and costs while watching their competitors fuse innovation and innovation into a winning formula (p.182)

The lesson: you can’t figure everything out yourself, and shouldn’t. The same pride that causes you to smash your competitors’ lightbulbs under your feet can prevent you from using your curiosity and problem-solving skills to thoroughly understand companies who have the same issues and perfectly good solutions that you could adopt – rather than relying on your own skills to solve every problem.

Is loyalty of the type expressed by lightbulb smashing and the executive’s email bad? No. But it has side effects, and those can be significant. The balance between loving your own products and being curious and respectful about what others (even competitors) have done is very delicate, and executives, no matter how intense their own loyalty may be, must manage this balance.

When competitors are everywhere, customer service is the ticket

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

I’m on the road a lot these days, and so I meet a lot of bartenders. Last night, the bartender who served me dinner said she’d been working in restaurants for eight years, but was studying to be an esthetician.

“There are a lot of restaurants,” I said, “but there seem to be even more salons. How do they attract and keep a clientele with so much competition out there?”

“You’ve got to be pretty good at customer service,” she said. Something people running businesses falling into the “commodity trap” should keep in mind.

Related post:
On “Beating the Commodity Trap”

“Beating the Commodity Trap” – how, maybe, to beat back the zombies

Monday, March 1st, 2010

livingdeadCommoditization is a word that sends chills up the spines of CEOs worldwide. A commodity is a completely replaceable, fungible item, purchased from any of many suppliers, with prices depressed to not much above the variable cost of production. Yuck!

The strategies that companies have used to battle commoditization, like product differentiation and bundling, are themselves being commoditized. Private-label copycats and new competition from emerging markets are increasing the forces of commoditization. With all this comes the need to look at the problem anew.

beating the commodity trapRichard A. d’Aveni of Darmouth’s Tuck School of Business has produced a slim volume entitled, “Beating the Commodity Trap: How to Maximize Your Competitive Position and Increase Your Pricing Power,” that performs just such a task. The best part of the book is the framework it lays out for thinking about commoditization; the three “traps”:

Deterioration – in which competitors duplicate some or all of your value proposition at a lower price

Proliferation – in which various firms serve business niches that eat away at your market

Escalation – in which competitors increase value and reduce cost at the same time

d’Aveni goes on to describe various strategies to use if you find yourself in one of these traps. Probably the most successful example cited is Microsoft’s response to a proliferation trap, in which smaller competitors created add-ons to Windows to provide capabilities like media management, virus protection and (the most famous case) web browsing. Microsoft used its monopoly power to duplicate these features and include them in Windows for free, both making Windows more valuable and eliminating the market potential for these competitors (”overwhelming” the trap, in d’Aveni’s parlance).

Of course, despite d’Aveni’s rigorous analytical approach and his numerous examples of successful counter-commoditizing, reading about the many ways commoditizers attack industry leaders in “Beating the Commodity Trap” may leave you with the feeling you have when you watch “Night of the Living Dead.” Even when you think the zombies are defeated, more always emerge from the shadows.

Sony to (eventually) marry cellphone, PSP handheld

Monday, June 29th, 2009

I almost fell out of my chair when I read this today:

Sony plans to set up a project team as early as July to develop a new product that combines functions of its portable game player and Sony Ericsson’s mobile phones, the Nikkei [Business Daily] said.

“As early as July”! If I have my calculations right, the iPhone has been on the market for two years. Sony & Ericsson should have built a prototype years ago. But now, finally, with tens of millions of iPhones sold, and a million Palm Pre’s, Sony is ready to put that project team together.

Is it any wonder that Sony is in trouble?

Teamwork works for Netflix Prize competitors

Monday, June 29th, 2009

Netflix has undoubtedly gotten much more than $1MM in publicity for its contest awarding a cool million to anyone able to improve its recommendation engine by more than 10%. But the contest appears to be winding down. According to the New York Times, a group has surpassed the 10% barrier, starting a 30-day countdown for any competitor to beat their performance and claim the prize instead.

It’s not likely to happen. That’s because the leading group is an alliance of several of the top performers in the competition, who abandoned their individual projects for a joint effort to push the needle past the magical 10% threshold. The Times wrote:

BellKor’s Pragmatic Chaos [the alliance's name] is a pretty elite crowd. The group is a collection of the 2007 and 2008 winners of the Netflix Progress Prizes — $50,000 a year for the teams that made the most progress toward the 10 percent improvement — and a pair of engineers from Montreal who have long been near the top of the contest’s leaderboard.

One of the tenets of alliances is that it’s better to get 25% of $1MM than 100% of nothing. For longtime competitors to band together shows how difficult the 10% barrier was, and the significant incremental value of combining different ideas.

In these times, it may be prudent to throw out the old rules of going it alone, and restricting alliances to those you don’t compete with. It worked for BellKor’s Pragmatic Chaos.

(Disclosure: I am a Netflix subscriber.)

Related posts:
Netflix demolishes own business model
Follow-ups: Netflix and “Harry Potter Marketing”

A brief story that explains the heart of an uber-competitor

Saturday, May 9th, 2009

The last couple of paragraphs of former Red Sox great Dom DiMaggio’s obituary in the New York Times today made up as succinct and insightful explanation of how an intense competitor thinks as I’ve ever read. In this case, that competitor is his brother Joe:

“I made two or three catches on Joe that were quite important to him,” he told The New York Times at an old-timers’ game at Yankee Stadium in August 1982 in which he appeared with brother Joe. “One year he was battling Hank Greenberg for the league lead in runs batted in and I caught a long one with the bases loaded for the third out.

“Coming in to the dugout after that catch, I half-glanced at Joe on his way to center field and I could feel the daggers flying my way. Joe always gave me terrible looks when I did something like that, but when he croaked me, he never apologized.”