Posts Tagged ‘feedback’

The story-based review: a better way to evaluate the results of a sales meeting

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

Years ago, my company hosted an important prospect in our US offices. The prospect was from Hong Kong, and in the balance was a deal worth US$5 million. Some weeks later, while we were onsite in Hong Kong for the final evaluation, we learned we had so mishandled the US meeting that it was a miracle we were still in the running. (In an even more miraculous occurrence, we actually won the deal, but that’s another story.)

We made two crucial mistakes with the meeting. First, we were ignorant of what was needed to make a meeting with a foreign company successful. Second, and most important, we didn’t seek feedback from the client after the meeting–so weeks passed before we even knew we had offended the prospect.

Here’s a better way to manage this. A couple of days after an important meeting, go back and ask the prospect to share stories about the meeting. Here are some example questions:

“Did anything about the meeting take you by surprise? What happened?”

“What were your expectations for the meeting, and how they differ from the way the meeting actually happened?”

“What story would you tell from the meeting if you wanted to recommend this firm to a friend?” and the opposite, “What story would you tell if you didn’t want your friend to work with this firm?”

Asking these questions soon after a meeting can help ground your team as to their real position in a deal. Many clients are delighted even to be asked for their feedback. if you do this regularly, the collection of stories will reveal patterns that are undermining your efforts in engagement after engagement (as well as point out your distinctive strengths). Asking for stories allows prospects to share richer and more candid feedback than simply asking for opinions. (”How’d the meeting go?” “Fine.”) Stories are more nuanced–and your team can easily find patterns and share lessons.

Related post:
Opening up your company for customer dialogue

Customers are talking: Dell acts on Twitter product feedback

Friday, June 12th, 2009

I was interested in this post from the NY Times Bits blog: “Dell Says It Has Earned $3 Million From Twitter.” Selling, after all, is one of the Five Archetypal Business Twitter Strategies.

But I was even more interested when I read this part of the post, almost a throwaway near the end:

Dell heard on Twitter that customers thought the apostrophe and return keys were too close together on the Dell Mini 9 laptop and fixed the problem on the Dell Mini 10. Now, the Dell Mini product development team is asking around on Twitter for new ideas for the next generation of the computer.

This is important, and it’s timely because it comes when Twitter users are coming under a lot of criticism for their, say, shallowness (examples here and here and here).

To 99.999% of people, someone complaining about the apostrophe and return keys on the Dell Mini 9 is worthless trivia. For Dell, that trivia–which is easy to find among the millions of Tweets posted daily–is extremely important. If it coalesces into a pattern, Dell engineers have something to use, besides gut feel or experience, to guide their product development decisions.

The very nature of Twitter (its simplicity, brevity and noisiness) is what frees people to post “trivia” like “Dell Inspiron Mini 9 keyboard is a little tight.” It takes a few seconds to get something like that off your chest–comments that, before Twitter, were not worth speaking in public. Now they are.

For companies like Dell, who listen to and act on these utterances, that is a big asset. For people who complain about Twitter’s shallowness, you are free to tune out.

“The Five Business Archetypal Twitter Strategies” is now available in Dutch!

Friday, June 5th, 2009

I’m honored (and amused) that Frislicht has translated my post “The 5 Archetypal Business Twitter Strategies” into Dutch. If you feel more fluent in that language, or you’d like to check it out anyway, here’s the link.

Dank u wel, Frislicht folks!

The Five Archetypal Business Twitter Strategies

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

Twitter continues to fascinate. As this general-purpose tool becomes more widespread, lots of ways for business to use it are emerging. Most businesses use some combination of these five archetypal strategies:

1. Promote. This goes without saying and is the easiest way to use Twitter. “Hey, we have a new product coming out! (link)” “Don’t forget to watch our Super Bowl ad (link).” etc. The jury is out as to whether this type of promotion is useful or simply washed away in the mass of Twitter noise–although if you have a strong following, the right product at the right moment, and can get the right people to tweet about you, it’s a beautiful thing. Examples: everybody.

2. Sell. I happened to get into a discussion on Twitter about sleep apnea. Right away a guy chimed in with a couple of questions. When I mentioned that I would love a particular type of product to help my condition, he let me know that such a product existed, how to find out more information on it, and (of course) how to order it. I bought the product pretty soon thereafter, through his referral. If you can identify users for your product by searching for tweets about it, you can find customers. Examples: The Sleep Apnea guy, Dell.

3. Care. If people are having trouble with your product and services, and they tweet about it, you can locate those tweets, intervene and solve the problem. If you’re lucky, the customer will tweet about how well you solved her issue. This strategy surprised me when it emerged–now I am surprised that it is still so rarely practiced. Examples: Comcast, EasyJet.

4. Converse. “User-centered innovation” may be more theory than reality today, but some companies are using Twitter to engage in real dialogues about what products they should feature or how their services should operate. The polling capability of Twitter is excellent for this purpose. Example: Best Buy. [Note: a great use of polling on Twitter is Andrew McAfee's "andyasks" project; here are some #andyasks results.]

5. Expose. Some companies are deciding that they can differentiate by humanizing themselves–and this means becoming more transparent. If people know that people–not just information systems, buildings and capital structures–work there, customers will want to buy from them. Twitter is a great way to open up your company; because it is inherently an individual medium, the personalities of the individuals who tweet come through. Be careful, though: if your tweeters are not representative of your company’s true culture, the disconnect will be apparent. Example: Zappos.

I need your help here. Are there other primary strategies? Are there other good examples for each? Please weigh in by leaving a comment.

Customers are talking: more Blackberry Storm stories

Sunday, May 17th, 2009

A few months ago, I gathered tweets and evaluated them to see what people thought of the Storm, the iPhone imitation from Blackberry. David Pogue of the New York Times had panned the device in his review, yet I found that the stories told on Twitter weren’t so bad.

Then today I found this entry on the Crackberry blog (via FierceWireless), a Blackberry users’ site unaffiliated with the company. The entry posted (then took down) preview pictures of the planned Storm II.

What’s left, even though the pictures are gone, are the comments. And in this set of comments, you’ll get a very interesting, 360 degree picture of what Storm users (and Blackberry fans) think of the device.

Some examples:

looks like the same crappy device that the first storm was in my opinion.. i am neither impressed

They need to offer those of us who put up with this laggy sub-optimal device so that their 4th QTR 08 and 1st QTR 09 numbers could get a boost a DEEP trade in discount.

I’m on my 4th storm because my screen keeps sticking

I like the clickable screen on places like the browser where you have to select something on the screen like a link. Not so much for typing. Say, what you will, it may be slower and the browser may not be as pretty, but browsing is a heck of a lot easier on the Storm than the Iphone because of it.

What?!? When I’m on break at work, I actually use my friend’s iPhone because it’s 10 times faster than my Storm.

(You can even treat yourself, partway down in the comments, to an impromptu discussion of the latest episode of “Lost”–part of the beauty of the open forum!)

Related posts:
The Blackberry Storm/Twitter project
“Lost” as a metaphor for the dysfunctional company

Customers are talking – opening your company up for customer dialogue

Thursday, March 26th, 2009

I recently recorded a podcast with Sydney Finkelstein of Dartmouth’s Tuck School of Business about his book “Think Again: Why Good Leaders Make Bad Decisions and How to Keep it From Happening to You” (shameless plug: you should listen to the podcast if you haven’t yet. It covers how tricky it is to make sound, reasoned decisions in our complex business world today).

After I posted the interview, I asked Syd what he thought of it. At the end of his response, he threw this in: “I appreciate your asking for feedback – not common.”

And over the past few weeks that sentence has stuck in my mind. It is very difficult for individuals to solicit and act on candid feedback. Companies, made up of individuals, have the same problem. There’s a self-protective impulse that wants to distance ourselves from criticism and harm.

Companies do solicit feedback, all the time. It’s just that, in my view, they rarely do it wanting to get the real story. They use it as PR (”see what good listeners we are”), as a way for customers to vent, or as a way to mine success stories. They don’t really want to know the candid truth, the bad stuff.

Netflix is an exception. They are constantly asking me what I think about their service. For Example:

Dear John,

We are always making improvements to ensure you receive your movies quickly. As part of this process, we ask our members about how we are doing from time to time. Please tell us when you received The Blue Planet: Seas of Life: Ocean World / Frozen Seas, which was shipped to you on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 by clicking on the appropriate link below….

Or this, after we used their streaming video service:

Survey: How Was the Picture and Audio Quality?

Dear John,

You recently watched Pokemon 3: The Movie. To help us ensure a great experience for all members, would you take a moment to tell us about the picture and audio quality?

They’re simple surveys and take only a moment to fill out. I do it religiously, in part because I’m happy they asked. And something, perhaps Netflix’s culture, the tone of the emails, etc., makes me feel that they act on this information. It’s not only for me to vent.

I would encourage Netflix to add one thing to these surveys–a text box, where users could add any feedback they wished. In interviews I’ve done, I’ve found that this question: “Is there anything else you think we should know?” often yields the most surprising and insightful information from customers.

Aside from this, Netflix handles the customer dialogue just about perfectly, in my view. No other company I know of has a similar continual, open, candid line of communication with its customers (if you have good examples, please add them in the comments; I’d love to compile a full list).

Does your company want to engage in a dialogue with its customers?

If so, ask yourself this: do you really want to hear everything? If so, customers are ready to tell you.

Related posts:
Buyers, tell companies why they lost your business
Netflix demolishes own business model
Candid customers won’t give you 100%

[Find a compendium of "Customers Are Talking" posts here.]

User reviews of all types benefit product sales

Saturday, March 7th, 2009

The Economist, in its “Technology Quarterly” section this week, discusses the value of user comments, and makes some interesting points, this one in particular:

Amazon…has allowed customers to post reviews of books and other products for many years. Initially, publishers and authors were worried that allowing negative reviews would hurt sales. Online retailers have generally been reluctant to allow users to leave comments, says John McAteer, Google’s retail industry director, who runs shopping.google.com, the internet giant’s comparison-shopping site. But a handful of bad reviews, it seems, are worth having. “No one trusts all positive reviews,” he says. So a small proportion of negative comments—“just enough to acknowledge that the product couldn’t be perfect”—can actually make an item more attractive to prospective buyers.

Why is that? Because 100% positive reviews smells like PR or shilling. It isn’t realistic, except in the minds of marketers. Shoppers know that no product fits every need. Seeing negative reviews, and being able to evaluate and compare oneself to the negative reviewer, is very useful to a shopper, who might think while reading a negative review:

“That person didn’t like the widget, but their complaint was minor to me.”

Or: “They pointed out a shortcoming that really doesn’t matter to me.”

Or: “Uh, oh, that really hit home. I don’t like that. Better stay away from this widget.”

So, it’s not really a paradox. Some negative reviews–not too many, of course–make your product seem more real, and therefore more attractive to a shopper, than a product the flaws of which are hidden behind the shiny veneer of public relations.

Related post:
Candid customers won’t give you 100%

Facebook, smacked down again, invites customer input

Friday, February 27th, 2009

Facebook always does the right thing by their customers… once their customers have beaten them up for a wrong first step. A year and a half ago they stirred up the wrath of their community by proposing an ad-targeting system leveraging its users’ profile data, then backed down.

Now they’ve done it again. Facebook changed their terms of service, igniting another storm of outrage on blogs, Twitter and, yes, Facebook. They relented, returning to their prior terms of service, and yesterday announced that they will be seeking user input on community questions such as terms of service, and be more transparent, including this statement:

Transparent Process: “Facebook should publicly make available information about its purpose, plans, policies, and operations. Facebook should have a town hall process of notice and comment and a system of voting to encourage input and discourse on amendments to these Principles or to the Rights and Responsibilities.”

It’s easy to make fun of Facebook for their public embarrassments, but they do get the message their users are sending. Furthermore, they are pioneers in engaging with their users. There is no template they can follow. Facebook’s users, because they give personal and sensitive information to the service, is very sensitive to its use, and the web2.0 nature of Facebook means that its users are comfortable using web2.0 means to communicate. Quiet they are not.

It will be fascinating to see how more traditional companies deal with assertive user bases. As consumers find their voices on line (and efforts like VRM give users powerful tools to manage and communicate with their vendors), we’ll be reading more stories like this one. Will other companies learn from Facebook’s painful lessons?

Related post:
Zuckerberg learns

Customers are talking – candid customers won’t give you 100%

Tuesday, February 24th, 2009

Two things happened to me recently that got me thinking about online product forums.

In the first instance, I was looking for an inexpensive hotel in Las Vegas. Deals abounded, but complications arose when I looked into the customer comments published online for each hotel. Here’s an extreme example:

Room was not in the main tower, it was right by the parking lot and the tunnel you had to walk through to get to the room smelled like puke and urine, also very hot. The door to the room beside us looked like it was ajar so I gave a little push, on the bed was a naked man laying there. Looked like he was waiting for someone to come into the room. I quickly closed the door and retreated back to our room. A few minutes later I looked back out and the door was ajar again. I think he was for hire. Was very scared because there was an adjoining door. It was very late and were very tired so tried to get some sleep. NOT! So much noise. Twice that night someone tried to open our door. Very scary. Cockroaches in bathroom in morning. Also very squeeky bed springs in room above that continued sqeeking for a long time (must be Viagra) Funny coincidence the room number was 169. This hotel is the seediest most unsafe disgusting place I have ever had to stay in. Never ever would go back.

Needless to say, I stopped looking for the lowest-cost deals after reading stuff like this.

Soon thereafter, I was one of a number of folks who received the same email from a friend, who had just opened a new business in town. She felt that a user review in Yelp.com, which had some criticisms, needed to be countered. To my friend, the negative statements were damaging. To me, as someone who works with helping companies listen to customers, the feedback was valuable and could be useful to her.

These two examples underline that even if you’re the Ritz-Carlton (never mind the hotel with the naked man on the bed), you will not get a perfect score from your clients. Not if they’re being candid with you. They will point out things that bothered them, that didn’t go perfectly, that are chronic weaknesses. Ignoring these forums or getting defensive is not only unwise, it’s self-defeating.

I wrote to my friend who has opened the local business. I told her that the Yelp review, while not 100% positive, did say many positive things (among which was that the reviewer had visited several times and planned to go back again–a strong testament). The negative things were accurate and, happily, could be easily addressed.

I recommended to her rather than try to debate the reviewer, take her comments to heart, act on them, and invite her back for another look.

I don’t know what to say to the owner of the hotel described above. Suffice it to say I won’t be staying anywhere near it.

Customers are talking: the Blackberry Storm/Twitter project

Monday, January 26th, 2009

Like a lot of people, I’ve been trying to get a handle on what Twitter means for businesses. My professional interest is in finding unsolicited customer stories and making sense of them–wherever they are. In this, Twitter has a lot of promise. It’s easy to use, brief and spontaneous. So are customers using this forum to talk about products? I decided to find out.

My test case was the Blackberry Storm. It received an absolutely terrible review from David Pogue, the New York Times’ consumer-electronics columnist. It also had very good early sales numbers–500,000 units the first month of its release, according to the Wall Street Journal. The combination of these made it an irresistible subject to study: would the Twittersphere be flooded with posts from enraged buyers?

The project was made more interesting today, when the Wall Street Journal published an article entitled, “Bumpy Start for Blackberry Storm,” which referred to complaints of early Storm users (but not Pogue’s review), including this vibrant quote: “I found myself wanting to throw it in the ocean due to my frustration with its overall usability.” The article also referred to a release of firmware soon after launch intended to address some of the early complaints, particularly response time.

I used Twitter Search to look for messages containing “Blackberry Storm” and a happy or sad emoticon (there’s a button on the advanced search page that enables you to restrict searches this way). I looked at 88 English-language tweets going back to December 27. Here’s what I found:

The biggest surprise to me was: where were the complaints from users? While half the Tweets were from Storm users, as opposed to people commenting on the Storm, or thinking about it, only 4 out of 44 (9%) of the users’ tweets were negative, while 23 (52%) were positive.

(If you want to check out the searches I created for this project, they are here: happy search, sad search. Twitter Search has been acting funny the past few days–I’m only able to get one page of recent results, and can’t search farther back. I used an RSS feed of the search over a period of weeks to gather the entire list of 88,)

From a customers are talking perspective, this isn’t a terrible outcome at all for the Storm. Whether the firmware change made that much difference, or the Blackberry brand loyalists are immune to hardware glitches, or simply that devices like this aren’t perfect and users expect that–they are not saying this is a terrible device. Many are saying that they like it. If I’m Blackberry and Verizon, I’m not discouraged by the Storm’s initial reception.

By the way, the WSJ has already started to backtrack. On the web site, the article is now entitled, “Blackberry Storm Is Off To A Bit of a Bumpy Start.”

(Disclosure, I am a Verizon customer and a Blackberry 8830 user. If you think I am a shill for Verizon, please don’t make up your mind until you read this post, or this one.)