Posts Tagged ‘segmentation’

Combat consumers’ price sensitivity with smart pricing strategies

Monday, May 17th, 2010

When recession hits, pricers seem to grab onto a couple of tools: how soon to discount, and how much? It seems more risky to use other pricing approaches in bad times than in good, but, as authors Marco Bertini and Luc Wathieu point out in the May Harvard Business Review (”How To Stop Customers From Fixating On Price“), smart pricing strategies can also serve to remind customers about things other than a product’s… well, price.

Bertini (London Business School) and Wathieu (European School of Management and Technology) identify four ways pricing can get customers thinking about a product’s distinctiveness:

1) Structure – pricing based on value delivered rather than on traditional (e.g., feature-based) attributes can help customers rationalize cost by tying it to a particular benefit. Example: Goodyear charging higher prices for tires with longer lifespans.

2) Pricing high (but not too high) - if a product has some inherent advantage, a premium price can reinforce the product’s distinctive image. (This fits Apple’s pricing strategy to a T.) Bertini and Wathieu found that, for example, pricing organic produce at 50-80% above standard competition aided recall and raised intent to purchase. (A low premium had little effect, and, sadly for skim-pricers everywhere, so did a very large premium.)

3) Partitioning – If a product includes a number of different benefits, it may make sense to charge individually for those benefits in order to make them stand out. Write Bertini and Wathieu, “people are unlikely to factor a benefit into their choice unless an explicit charge is made for it.” They also agree that this strategy can be taken too far, as in the recent, nearly complete unbundling of the humble airline ticket, in which separate charges for restroom use are being seriously considered.

4) Equalizing price points – companies often charge different prices for similar items (for example, in Pennsylvania, milk prices go up with fat content – kind of counterintuitive, isn’t it?). Recall the record labels’ ultimately successful battle with Apple to have some iTunes selections priced at $1.29 versus $0.99. The authors state that removing the small pricing distinctions between similar goods can increase consumption overall, by simplifying the consumer’s job at the point of purchase.

Selling today: casting a wide net and “going for the no”

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

Market segmentation is a very attractive concept. Analyzing a group of customers, comparing it to the capabilities of your product set, and deciding who are the highest-probability targets. Salespeople then focus their efforts on this narrower set of prospects. Sales then follow.

At its worst, though, segmentation allows you to fall in love with a small pipeline. After all, if the prospects are in the target segments, they should be easier to close than an undifferentiated mass.

But these days, negative factors are overwhelming positive factors in buying. In other words, companies’ reluctance to do anything during this downturn means that there are far more automatic “no’s” out there than during boom times.

For the salesperson, as a result, the small pipeline is the kiss of death. No amount of persuasion, reference-sharing, value proposition development, trial closing, etc., will turn around a prospect who’s not ready, willing, and able to do business with you. And today being a “ready, willing and able” prospect means having a business problem that’s so acute that you are willing to surmount all the obstacles to get it approved and funded.

How does the salesperson deal with this? Understanding the business problem her solution addresses is the first step. Then, finding customers suffering acutely from that problem is paramount. This may mean ignoring or de-emphasizing market segments in favor of casting a very wide net, to get lots and lots of suspects. And then, using Jeff Thull’s terminology, “going for the ‘no’”–meaning very quickly assessing whether they prospect has the business problem, and whether its acute enough to take that person’s time, resources and budget to address it right now. If it’s a no, say “thank you” and move on.

Someday, we may be able again to isolate high-potential prospects through market segmentation. At this moment, I’ll put my money on a ton of leads.

Related posts:
Downturn is costing companies their adventurousness
To close, a purchaser must be ready, willing and able