Posts Tagged ‘service’

The refurb economy

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Now mister the day my number comes in I ain’t ever gonna ride in no used car again. Bruce Springsteen, “Used Cars”

The MacBook Pro on which I’m composing this post was bought from the Apple online store two and a half years ago, a refurbished model. After our coffeemaker died, rather than buy a new one we sent the old one back to be remanufactured for $75, shipping included.

And, of course, our “new” car is now eight years old.

If one thing has happened to us and people we know in the recent, long recession, it’s this: we no longer fetishize new things. In the 1980s, when Springsteen wrote the lyrics excerpted above, and earlier, the purchase of a new anything, but especially a new car, was a symbol of affluence, of making it. The hunger for the new led to planned obsolescence and a throwaway society.

It’s a bit of return to older values, I think, that more business will be associated with repair, refurbishment and other services intended to keep our things working longer, as opposed to stamping out millions of shiny new thingies that won’t last.

If that’s an outcome of the recent crisis, that’s OK with me.

Our old car

Our "old car"

Related post:
Midlife crisis, 21st century style

“Backshoring”: the new buzzword that may give you a job

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

A recent post from Booz & Company’s “Strategy + Business” introduced a new term: “backshoring” – an emerging trend of returning manufacturing from an offshore location to the home country (”The Case For Backshoring“). This is especially important for US business, which has been a very aggressive proponent of offshoring for the past decade. Why is this reversal happening? In short, the conditions that made outsourcing look so attractive have changed utterly:

…The logic behind backshoring is compelling enough that it cannot be easily dismissed as a mere short-term aberration. Higher transportation costs as well as rising wages and raw materials prices in China, inevitable by-products of the huge gains that the developing country’s GDP has made despite the global recession, have frightened some U.S. companies away from Asia.

Another factor is the impact of distance from core customers on products with heavy user contribution:

NCR’s decision to backshore goes well beyond dollars and cents — and, in fact, may provide the most convincing rationale for the gains that backshoring can produce. The ATMs being made in Columbus now are NCR’s most sophisticated, capable of scanning checks and cash and eliminating the need for the customer to fill out a deposit slip. This feature has provided a welcome revenue lift for NCR — bringing in as much as US$50 million a year, significant for a company with $5 billion in annual sales. But these machines likely never would have been developed had large customers like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America not persistently prodded NCR to move in that direction. That type of potentially profitable interaction between NCR and its customers is difficult, and launching desirable new products is slowed considerably, NCR’s Dorsman says, when the manufacturing facilities are offshore. “We take our cue from our customers,” says Dorsman. “They are heavily involved in the development process. And with this new approach we’re taking, we can get innovative products to the market faster, no question.”

NCR also found that having Flextronics manufacture high-end ATMs in Brazil — and relying on the vendor’s third-party suppliers, many of which NCR was unfamiliar with — left important internal constituencies in the dark, further slowing and complicating new product launches. Hardware and software engineers, sourcing executives, manufacturing and operations staff, and customer service managers all had trouble applying their expertise throughout the many remote handoffs between separate organizations.

The post does not take up whether outsourced business processes, such as customer service, are also being “backshored”–though I’ve heard of companies pulling some sales processes back from locations such as India and the Philippines due to ineffectiveness. And the same economic factors (increased costs at offshore locations) are at play. It’s good to realize, at any rate, that the trend of sending processes far away is not inexorable and there may be, in fact, good reasons for companies to keep them at home.

P&G, in moving into services, can learn lessons from Disney

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

I read with interest the recent HBR Editors’ Blog posting speculating on the difficulties Procter & Gamble might run into in its effort to create a chain of car wash franchises, called Mr. Clean Performance Car Wash.

When I read the post, written by marketing professors Neeli Bendapudi, Randle D. Raggio and Tassu Shervani, we were in the midst of a vacation in Orlando, Florida, at the various Disney parks. So, the connection between what P&G is trying to do now and what Walt Disney kicked off some fifty years ago came to me instantly.

The upshot of the HBR post is that product and services businesses are dramatically different, in particular the need for a service business to deliver an experience over and over again, consistently and of high quality, despite the innate variability of people, locations and customers.

With this in mind I monitored my Disney experience for the rest of the week for lessons that could help P&G.

  1. Brand gets people to try your service; blocking and tackling gets them to return. The Disney properties flaunt the characters, movies and TV shows at every turn. Yet after an hour at the park, you notice that trash cans are always close by, so that if you have an empty cup or candy wrapper, you don’t end up holding it for more than a few seconds before finding a place to discard it. As a result, the park is exceptionally clean for a place holding tens of thousands of guests.
  2. No detail is too small. Kids are royalty at Disney (a significant differentiator compared to most places where they are seen as messy, noisy attention-seekers–which, of course, they are). The bag checkers, waitresses, salespeople–in short, every “cast member” we encountered–took special care of our kids.
  3. Consistency reduces stress. Each of the four Disney parks we visited had a similar parking scheme, shuttle bus protocal, and entry design. Which meant there was very little standing around head-scratching and wondering which gate to go through or which bus to board.
  4. Customer recognition builds loyalty. Everywhere in the parks I saw guests wearing buttons saying “My First Time!” or “It’s My Birthday Today!” These simple gestures to recognize guests made their experiences special, built warm memories, and encouraged them to return.

I’m rooting for P&G in their Mr. Clean car wash project. The above lessons are like much good advice–easy to understand, hard to implement. Whether P&G can execute, and the marketplace and the economy cooperate, only time will tell.